Discussion about this post

User's avatar
jackman's avatar

Hmmm, there are so many things I profoundly disagree with in this piece, though I’ve found myself often more in sync with the commentariat of some of these pieces. The idea of cavalierly saying that now we must have regime change in Russia? What sort of titanic arrogance does it take to walk around imagining that we can and should be just knocking off leaders here and there as we see fit? Or the fact that Russia as a nuclear power shouldn’t enter the calculation of creating an expectation amongst Americans that nothing short of killing Putin is a satisfactory solution to this crisis? It’s like people are being encouraged to believe that international relations are as complex as checkers. And with nuclear annihilation hanging in the balance. It’s all chilling. Maybe we should get rid of Xi also. He kind of makes me uneasy too.

“Since Nato is a defensive rather than an aggressive pact, why should Ukraine or any country joining NATO be a problem for Russia, unless it harbors hopes of invading their territory at some future point?” Yow, one almost doesn’t know how to respond to the shallowness of a statement like that. First of all, a ‘defensive pact’ is no different than ‘defensive weapons’, which is to say that they can, and are, used aggressively. But let’s be even simpler. Let’s just transport the whole set piece to the United States and say that China decides that it wants to invite Chile, Argentina and Bolivia into a so-called ‘defensive pact’, the China Pacific Treaty Organization (CPTO) and then gradually creeps up the continent until it invites Mexico into the ‘defensive pact’, to which the US hits the brakes. A Chinese Daniel Pinchbeck would be writing literally the exact same sentence, saying, Since CPTO is a defensive rather that an aggressive pact, why should the United States or any country joining CPTO be a problem for America, unless it harbors hopes of invading their territory at some future point? Of course, we know that the United State wouldn’t tolerate the prospect of such a threat in their hemisphere—even if 5000 miles away in Chile—for a millisecond, that such an incursion would be regarded as a unconscionable threat to our sovereignty and territorial influence, and needn’t require explanation. At the same time, the very same Chinese version of Daniel P. would then write (using your exact words): I do not find it credible to believe that any CPTO countries had the slightest interest in launching an unprovoked invasion or attack on a nuclear-missle-armed-to-the-teeth United States. The goal of CPTO is to establish stable security and peace so that countries within the pact can focus on their economies, social services, and so on (human progress, in other words), and according to a system of agreed-upon laws and conventions. etc, etc. Of course, the US in this case isn’t frightened of an attack by all the combined countries of South America, but they are terrified of all those countries attacking aligned with China, its sponsor, just a Russia looks at NATO and Western Europe and us. But we’re unable to hold the simplest mirror to ourselves, nor is Pinchbeck.

But y'know what--my biggest disappointment is that I sit here and wonder, where is the love, where is the kindness, where is the wisdom, where is the shamanic perspective that one might find in this moment in this newsletter? Where is a vision that seeks to step outside of everyday consciousness? I don’t see a hint of it. This all reads like the Council On Foreign Relations. It’s as though we’re to get excited by the possibilities of shamanism and psychedelics in ordinary times, but when things get heated, when things get ‘real’, we’re going to run back to these ruts of conventional thinking, these lines of masculine drive and logic that are already destroying the world as we know it. But here we have just more of it, dressed up with some nods to a new way of thinking, a new consciousness. I would have thought in this moment Daniel would counsel people to go outside, look up at the stars, and take a deep breath. Remember you’re alive. Remember that you won’t always be, no matter what happens in the Ukraine. Walk back inside and center yourself. Rather than hunch over our computers and contemplate this nonsense masquerading as deep wisdom.

Expand full comment
JewsRejectZionistNazism&Terror's avatar

Thank you for this interesting post. Regarding rhe framework from which to understand this current conflict i'd like to suggest two essays which i think are insightful,

This https://caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/ukraine-is-a-sacrificial-pawn-on?s=r

And this https://caitlinjohnstone.substack.com/p/big-brave-keyboard-warriors-notes?s=r

and then with regard to the broader vision and the needed societal transformation, I'd like to point out what I think is the structural root cause of this (and any) war, and what can be dome about this (dealing here only with the structural root, not the psychological root, since that is much more complex and vast than what can be dealt with in one comment, i think)

Right now (and for the last 370 years, since the westphalia agreement of 1649) we have a nation-state based "world order" (or a world disorder, more accurately) which is anti-wholistic, sectarian and destructive to the extreme, and which literally guarantees that we will forever live in a state of conflict and war (for as long as this is the structural world "order" we live in). In this "world order" the entire planet is divided into nearly 200 separate atomised units (nation-states) who are each armed to the teeth and are in competition with each other to secure their own narrow sectarian "NATIONAL INTERESTS". They secure these "national interests" either through physical aggression or economic aggression (or both), each one trying to selfishly grab as much it can for itself and its "national interests" in a dog-eat-dog type of world where the smaller units get destroyed exploited raped and eaten up by the bigger bullies. It is a "world order" of bullies. A world order which creates bullies and strongly rewards bullies. A "world order" which is based on the assumption of separation, enshrines division, selfishness and competition as the "natural way of things" and guarantees that we will forever live in a state of conflict and war (until we destroy ourselves). The current war is a natural progession and expression of the nationalist sectarian "world order" we are living in. It could not happen if these weren't the basic rules the game and the basic assumptions that guide our civilization.

So what can be done? What is the solution to that?

In my view, the solution that no one seems to be talking about in these times of nationalist fervor and bloodthirst for war and collective psychosis, is to flip the rules of the game from a sectarian divisive atomised mentality into a wholistic perception and structure, a structure that will guarantee and celebrate national uniqueness and difference and at the same time will also guarantee that the national differences are NOT a source of conflict and competition but rather a source of enrichment of the human experience. In other words, a united states of the earth, a wholistic human federation of the earth. And in a minute I will give you a more practical illustration of what this means.

In my view, this will create the structural conditions that would allow for a whole new way, a mature, joyous and sane way of relating and existing.

And as you will see in a minute, even though it seems at first a non-personal political issue (and therefore perhaps uninteresting), it is actually, in my view, profoundly personal and affects every aspect of life on earth.

It shows how it is possible for nationalism and patriotism to function NOT as divisive destructive egoic unintelligent murderous force that inevitably leads humanity into a mentality of dog-eat-dog competition, sectatianism, antagonism and conflict, of one nation destroying others for its egoic "national interest" (which is the way our immature world system currently functions), but rather it shows how it is possible to create the structural conditions that will transform nationalism from a source of conflict into a source of enrichment, that will turn nationalism and patriotism from such a destructive sectarian anti-wholistic murderous unintelligent force that is dividing and separating humanity, into a force that enriches and contributes to the wellness and prosperity of humanity, NOT destroy humanity (as it does now, as we can clearly see right in front of our eyes).

In other words, it shows what are the structural conditions necessary that will turn national uniqueness from a force of antagonism, rivalry, sectarian aggression and exploitation into a force of contribution to the well being of the whole, to the richness of the human experience.

To say it differently (and please listen carefully to this part) - we can see how this outlook has already been applied on the national level and then how it can easily be applied also o the planetary level. For example, look at a wholistic framework called 'the united states of america'. This federation prevents any particular state from declaring war and attacking another state, becasue they have been bound together in the same framework, in the same federation, and are demilitarised. No state is attacking, bombing, invading, plundering and exploiting another state, because they are bound together in one framework, in one federation, a state does NOT operate as an atomised selfish unit that is completely separate from other units. No state attacks other states and tries to grab as much for itself for its "national interests" at the expense of other units (states) in the greater whole (which is called 'the united states'). It doesn't do that becasue it is an equal part of a greater whole, of one federation, and so the other states are not its enemies but are its allies inside the same whole that they are both part of. Like two cells operating inside the same body, the same whole.

In the exact same way, a wholistic framework that encompasses all the world's nation states will transform their relationship FROM being atomised egoic units who are antagonistic to each other and in competition with each other and who try to grab as much as possible for their own selfish "national interests" at the expense of others, INTO a relationship of friendly entities who are part of a greater whole, a greater federation, and who do NOT have antagonistic and conflicting interests, becasue the interests and well being of the whole is their own well being.

It completely changes the rules of the game from an immature sociopathic egoic one in which one unit feels that it must destroy others in order to secure its "national interests", into a mature sane relationship in which the uniqueness of each nation does not need to be in competition to other nations but are working together in cooperation because they are part of one whole, of one wholistic human federation of the earth.

In my view, this is the application on the macro level of the same wisdom and maturity that many of us have already realized on the micro level of personal relationships (that an immature sociopathic ego who acts to benefit only his/her "personal interests" with complete disregard of the damage and suffering he/she is causing others, will clearly create nothing but havoc, destruction, trauma and suffering all around him/her self) . Isn't it time that we applied what is obvious in personal relationship also to the macro level of the national ego, and stop acting like murderous sociopathic narcissists also on the national level?

In my view, what is suggested here will create the structural conditions that will allow for such maturing of the dysfunctional sociopathic nationalist ego and will create a PROFOUND DIFFERENCE in today's fragmented warring anti-wholistic sectarian dog-eat-dog divided world.

Please do read this essay and give this careful consideration. In my view, this is profoundly important for life on earth

https://oneworldrenaissance.com/2022/02/12/nation-states-nationalism-and-the-common-good/

That essay above was quite short and didn't dive deeply into the actual roots of where this nationalistic separative anti-wholistic atomised mentality came from (the mentality that led to the divisions into nationalities in the first place, as well as to the separate egoic mentality on the personal level). This truly profound and wise essay below does exactly that. Very very highly recommend

https://oneworldrenaissance.com/2021/01/23/holism-fragmentation-and-our-endangered-future-a-new-vision-and-a-new-hope/

Expand full comment
16 more comments...

No posts