Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fran Bull's avatar

Thank you for this terrific and thoughtful essay on a question that has kept me up at night. Antichrist – all of them. Soulless creatures, hollow men--not men really, more like men in arrested development at early adolescence. These are addicts of power. Empty narcissists-nothing, no amount of money, will fill the emptiness in their hearts and souls. The rest of us are suffering and will suffer going forward. Perhaps the current nationwide demonstrations, involving more and more people on every side, will awaken some who are still unaware of this spreading cancer.

This is what they want to do in their very short tenure on this earth.

Expand full comment
Leigh Horne's avatar

Manomanoman, but you've stuffed this taco with a whole lotta fixins. Yummy. So, even though I'm way out of my typical depth here, I can't resist a couple of things. But before I do I want to thank you for a big clue as to why Peter Thiel has publically lamented the fact that women ever got the vote. Been wondering about that. So it's not just a desire to keep his claws on the perch he preens on, but a convoluted relationship with the single largest gender category on earth. Maybe his momma was a B--. But that's neither here nor there as his hyper-rational left brain wired lack of empathy would be reason enough to beware of him and his ilk. What I wanted to do was dig a little deeper into your 'why' question by taking a longer look into the nature of addiction and its relationship to the perennial question of what it means to be a fully mature human of either sex. (Actually, the Talmud specifies either 7 or 9 different genders, depending on who you're asking, I've heard.) I worked with addicts in a special program developed by Johns Hopkins and implemented at its East Baltimore campus where I was employed as a counselor. That's just to establish some kind of cred. What's always seemed saddest and most revealing about addiction is that it's ultimately so unsatisfactory to the addict, while at the same time destroying his or her access to other forms of pleasure. And along the way so, so much shit happens, up to and including an extreme form of shriveling, akin to soul death. Which observation can be applied to any form of addiction/insistence upon any particular bright shiny object as well as chemical 'enhancers.' So, take Mr. Bezos. After laboring to develop a new wau to market and retail just about every kind of product available, and losing his shirt for years while trying to establish it, he was first lionized (a heady drug indeed), then enriched (ditto), then idolized and so on, by which time he was a goner in need of endless more fixes of adulation and maybe buying power too. So he's got the trophy fiance and the BIG BIG boat. Now he wants to demolish a historic bridge under which his yacht can't pass on its way to whatever competitive party he's planning to go to that weekend (quaint term, that). And he wants to expand his empire as well as his margins, WITH NO END IN MIND. And there's the lack of satisfaction--the black hole--more and more resulting in less and less satisfaction. I assume Zuckerberg and the others are somewhere on this spectrum as well.

Compare this with a craftsman or artist who also can never ever reach some ultimate perfection in his or her efforts, but who is elevated by the intense joy in the effort to approach it, and then see what comes of that comparison, and what it points toward in terms of human nature, as it is, vs what it's currently advertised to be.

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts