I'd love to hear more about what Thomspon says about ufology. Temporal anomalies, like missing time, and evidence that the shape-shifting other has access to an additional dimension of time span all encounters with mystical entities from fairies to "aliens." There's consistent testimony that those on the other side of the event horizon of death transcend the space/time construct that seems so real to those of us incarnated in meat bodies. Here's something I wrote about that a couple of weeks ago: what people interpret as ‘extraterrestrials’ are far more likely shapeshifting disincarnate former humans who have become mind parasites seeking to torment us and feed off our negative emotions."
"My late colleague, Terrence McKenna, said that if we wanted to look for an ecology of souls (supposed ‘aliens’) that would be highly interested in us, who would understand our psychology intimately, and would usually take on hominid-like forms, the most likely source would be us—us from the part of the lifecycle we usually can't observe—the human dead. Specifically, the earthbound dead, those who can't move on and still want to interact and feed their terrestrial desires. A mountain of evidence stretches back thousands of years to support that. And when Terrence showed artist renderings of the ‘Greys’ to Amazonian shamans, they said, ‘Oh, the ancestors.’
So, we need to be careful about those who claim extraterrestrial contact when those experiences have so much continuity with strange encounters people have had for millennia. We live at the dawn of the space age, so what people see and label now as UFOs and extraterrestrials were called by other names in the past. There was an abductee who found herself on a ship surrounded by what appeared to be grey aliens examining her, but then she recognized one of them as her deceased mother. And I’ve had my own encounter with what at first looked like an alien coming out of a silver disc, but then proved to be a deceased person from my old neighborhood in the Bronx.
My reading of the evidence is that most of what people call ‘aliens’ are disincarnate human beings appearing in forms that are part psychoid and part physical and who seek interaction with the living for a variety of motives. There have been some encounters where the ‘aliens’ will actually say they are dead people. Same with some fairie encounters of yesteryear. A common theme in modern abductions is the so-called aliens will say they need to hybridize with us because they’ve become nonviable and can no longer experience emotion. To me, that sounds more like a hungry ghost than a different species from an advanced alien civilization.
Whitley and Ann Streiber documented the connection, but we now have a much more comprehensive source, Joshua Cutchin’s exhaustively researched book, The Ecology of Souls. I’ve exchanged a few messages with him, and his two-part work, which is about 1100 pages long, is the definitive source on the topic.
I will definetly check out Thompson's writing. Amazing stuff. He sounds like he may have fallen though the cracks as he was someone (like Steiner) whose ideas were ahead of his time . . . however we are now at a point where his time has come.
Hi Daniel I still haven’t received a discount for your occult series , so I can’t sign up.
I'd love to hear more about what Thomspon says about ufology. Temporal anomalies, like missing time, and evidence that the shape-shifting other has access to an additional dimension of time span all encounters with mystical entities from fairies to "aliens." There's consistent testimony that those on the other side of the event horizon of death transcend the space/time construct that seems so real to those of us incarnated in meat bodies. Here's something I wrote about that a couple of weeks ago: what people interpret as ‘extraterrestrials’ are far more likely shapeshifting disincarnate former humans who have become mind parasites seeking to torment us and feed off our negative emotions."
"My late colleague, Terrence McKenna, said that if we wanted to look for an ecology of souls (supposed ‘aliens’) that would be highly interested in us, who would understand our psychology intimately, and would usually take on hominid-like forms, the most likely source would be us—us from the part of the lifecycle we usually can't observe—the human dead. Specifically, the earthbound dead, those who can't move on and still want to interact and feed their terrestrial desires. A mountain of evidence stretches back thousands of years to support that. And when Terrence showed artist renderings of the ‘Greys’ to Amazonian shamans, they said, ‘Oh, the ancestors.’
So, we need to be careful about those who claim extraterrestrial contact when those experiences have so much continuity with strange encounters people have had for millennia. We live at the dawn of the space age, so what people see and label now as UFOs and extraterrestrials were called by other names in the past. There was an abductee who found herself on a ship surrounded by what appeared to be grey aliens examining her, but then she recognized one of them as her deceased mother. And I’ve had my own encounter with what at first looked like an alien coming out of a silver disc, but then proved to be a deceased person from my old neighborhood in the Bronx.
My reading of the evidence is that most of what people call ‘aliens’ are disincarnate human beings appearing in forms that are part psychoid and part physical and who seek interaction with the living for a variety of motives. There have been some encounters where the ‘aliens’ will actually say they are dead people. Same with some fairie encounters of yesteryear. A common theme in modern abductions is the so-called aliens will say they need to hybridize with us because they’ve become nonviable and can no longer experience emotion. To me, that sounds more like a hungry ghost than a different species from an advanced alien civilization.
Whitley and Ann Streiber documented the connection, but we now have a much more comprehensive source, Joshua Cutchin’s exhaustively researched book, The Ecology of Souls. I’ve exchanged a few messages with him, and his two-part work, which is about 1100 pages long, is the definitive source on the topic.
I will definetly check out Thompson's writing. Amazing stuff. He sounds like he may have fallen though the cracks as he was someone (like Steiner) whose ideas were ahead of his time . . . however we are now at a point where his time has come.